[Beowulf] cheap PCs this christmas
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Michael Barnes mbarnes at compsci.wm.eduTue Nov 22 10:41:23 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] cheap PCs this christmas
- Next message: [Beowulf] cheap PCs this christmas
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 04:04:37PM +0000, Tony Travis wrote: > I'm interested to know about other people's views and experiences of > the reliability of COTS (i.e. non-ECC) memory? My view has always been to use ECC memory. Aside from non-ECC memory being cheaper, I see no benefits of using it when one accounts for downtime, troubleshooting, paying for replacement RAM, and worse getting wrong results. Honestly, I never knew that not using ECC RAM on anything besides a nonessential system like a standard desktop configuration was ever an option. Mike -- /-----------------------------------------\ | Michael Barnes <mbarnes at compsci.wm.edu> | | UNIX Systems Administrator | | College of William and Mary | | Phone: (757) 879-3930 (cell) | \-----------------------------------------/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] cheap PCs this christmas
- Next message: [Beowulf] cheap PCs this christmas
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
