[Beowulf] Liinpack benchmark
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
feldy at acm.org feldy at acm.orgMon Nov 14 12:22:20 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: cheap PCs this christmas
- Next message: [Beowulf] cheap PCs this christmas
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Robert G. Brown wrote: > I'm looking to see if one can WRITE to the TSC post boot -- if one can > then it might be a fix for the kernel team -- install an ntp-like > handshaking/sync process at a controlled point in the boot so that all > CPUs emerge from a linux boot with their counters in sync. Assuming the I believe this linux already does this (meaning sync the TSC), at least using FC4 on an x86_64 machines (intel). Here's a snippet of the dmesg from a dual processor system with hyperthreading turned off) CPU 1: Syncing TSC to CPU 0. Brought up 2 CPUs time.c: Using PIT/TSC based timekeeping. testing NMI watchdog ... OK. checking if image is initramfs... CPU 1: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff 52 cycles, maxerr 1207 cycles) and with hyperthreading turned on CPU 1: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff -23 cycles, maxerr 1290 cycles) CPU 2: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff -4 cycles, maxerr 915 cycles) CPU 3: synchronized TSC with CPU 0 (last diff -19 cycles, maxerr 1290 cycles)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: cheap PCs this christmas
- Next message: [Beowulf] cheap PCs this christmas
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
