[Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
ar 3107 ar3107 at gmail.comWed Nov 9 21:36:00 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Fwd: [torqueusers] TORQUE 2.0.0p1 Release
- Next message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
We are looking into designing a low cost, high performance storage system. Requirements as below: - Starts at 3TB, should scale up by adding more servers to say 10-12TB - Use commodity technologies (x86_64, IB, GE, Linux), preferably all OSS components - Provide high I/O which scales with addition of storage nodes. - To be used for hosting user home dirs so reliability is important - The HPC cluster starts with 6 AMD64 nodes and is expected to scale to 1000+nodes in a year. - Preferably without FC/SAN We do have experience with IBM GPFS, PVFS (1,2), NetApps, PolyServe but not with GFS and LUSTRE. PVFS is not reliable enough for home dirs (OK for scratch), GPFS cannot do RAID5 like striping across nodes, needs SAN for RAID1 like mirroring (cost $$$) , polyserve is too expensive (per CPU pricing) Is GFS or Lustre suitable for the above needs? Any other commercial slution? I would like to know the experiences and suggestions from the advanced users on this list. Regards, Arvind -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20051110/a969e08b/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Fwd: [torqueusers] TORQUE 2.0.0p1 Release
- Next message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
