[Beowulf] Bernhard Kuhn's real time interrupt patch
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Andrew Piskorski atp at piskorski.comFri Mar 25 15:52:38 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Bernhard Kuhn's real time interrupt patch
- Next message: [Beowulf] Bernhard Kuhn's real time interrupt patch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 04:10:15PM -0500, Patrick Geoffray wrote: > I don't think this patch improves the interrupt latency or the interrupt > overhead when there is no contention. Context switching is the metric > you want to improve. > > With OS-bypass NICs, interrupts are rare and there is usually no contention. Contention for what, the NIC? I was thinking that Kuhn looked at interrupt latency under heavy CPU usage, but I guess I was confused. What he actually measured was greatly tightening up the distribtuion of interrupt latency under varying network (ping), disk (looping on 'find /'), and "graphics" (glxgears) loads. I don't understand the ramifications of that. So is it true that kernel interrupt latency only matters for non-OS-bypass NICs? (E.g., your typical ethernet card.) And stuff like Myrinet and SCI doesn't care? -- Andrew Piskorski <atp at piskorski.com> http://www.piskorski.com/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Bernhard Kuhn's real time interrupt patch
- Next message: [Beowulf] Bernhard Kuhn's real time interrupt patch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
