[Beowulf] Alternative to MPI ABI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.comFri Mar 25 15:03:15 PST 2005
- Previous message: [O-MPI users] Re: [Beowulf] Alternative to MPI ABI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Alternative to MPI ABI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Lindahl wrote: > Patrick, if you read what both Jeff and I wrote, I believe it's clear > we both understand that part, because we've both mentioned that > particular implementation solution. What I was trying to understand > was why Jeff thought this was a huge nightmare. What Jeff thought is a nightmare, I believe, is to have to decide a common interface and then force the MPI implementations to adopt this interface internally instead of having them translating on the fly. It's like having a common language in The EU. Either we decide it will be French and everybody else starts to teach French at school, or we choose Esperanto, and everybody translate their national language in Esperanto when they want to deal with another EU member. There would be a lot of blood on the floor before French is adopted. > something? Does this somehow save a significant amount of work for > anyone? It does not, but the pill is much easier to swallow because nobody has to fight to try to impose the interface they happen to use. Am I still drunk and missing something big ? Patrick -- Patrick Geoffray Myricom, Inc. http://www.myri.com
- Previous message: [O-MPI users] Re: [Beowulf] Alternative to MPI ABI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Alternative to MPI ABI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
