[Beowulf] Alternative to MPI ABI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.comFri Mar 25 11:34:43 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Alternative to MPI ABI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Why Do Clusters Suck?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Jeff, Jeff Squyres wrote: > You get the idea. This is pretty much the position I reached after talking with other MPI developers and some ISVs. Bill's paper shows that it is technically possible, what is missing is the critical mass. We may have that today. > There's a slight performance penalty for the translation layer, but for > those who want an MPI ABI, this might well be an acceptable price to pay. This performance penalty would be negligeable for the current MPI operations on today's machines. This common external interface could be designed to do the translation faster. This design has my vote. Patrick -- Patrick Geoffray Myricom, Inc. http://www.myri.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Alternative to MPI ABI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Why Do Clusters Suck?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
