[Beowulf] Re: Why Do Clusters Suck?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David Mathog mathog at mendel.bio.caltech.eduTue Mar 22 11:42:57 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Alternative to MPI ABI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Why Do Clusters Suck?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 Douglas Eadline wrote: > > So why do clusters suck? Would that they did suck - it would make cooling them a lot easier. Unfortunately while most of them blow pretty well their sucking sucks. Which has nothing to do with your original post, assuming either of these messages actually make it through anybody's spam filters. More to the point, while there is certainly a lot of room for improvement, an awful lot of work is getting done today using existing cluster technology and it's far from clear to me that an advance in cluster management software would result in much more productivity. As opposed to, for instance, improving network throughput, CPU power, or component reliability by a factor of 10, any one of which would lead to an immediate and dramatic productivity increase. Regards, David Mathog mathog at caltech.edu Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Alternative to MPI ABI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Why Do Clusters Suck?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
