[Beowulf] Quasi-Non-Von-Neumann hardware in a Beowulf
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Andrew Piskorski atp at piskorski.comThu Mar 10 20:50:50 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Quasi-Non-Von-Neumann hardware in a Beowulf
- Next message: [Beowulf] Quasi-Non-Von-Neumann hardware in a Beowulf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 08:08:17PM -0500, Robert G. Brown wrote: > they can help it. However, these folks are totally happy with > kilorands/sec, let alone megarands/sec. I need hundreds of > megarands/sec. The VIA x86 cpus have "PadLock ACE" RNG hardware, but they only claim 1.5 mbit/s or so. Lots slower than your dual Opterons pushing PRNG code, but then, those little Vias are probably happy to get other work done too while spitting out those random bits. :) Some web links say that Diehard is happy with the Via's output. But then I've also heard that Diehard wasn't intended (still true?) for finding the type of non-randomness hardware generators are prone to: http://www.robertnz.net/hwrng.htm http://www.robertnz.net/true_rng.html I wonder if the Via's underlying randomness sampling mechanism is inherently rate limited, or if they could scale it up to a single small RNG-only chip with 100 or 1000 times the bit rate. There does seem to be some market for such a thing, so since they have not done so, probably not? -- Andrew Piskorski <atp at piskorski.com> http://www.piskorski.com/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Quasi-Non-Von-Neumann hardware in a Beowulf
- Next message: [Beowulf] Quasi-Non-Von-Neumann hardware in a Beowulf
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
