[Beowulf] [firstname.lastname@example.org: Re: Intel?]
hahn at physics.mcmaster.ca
Wed Jun 8 08:21:34 PDT 2005
> Being one of those 'apparent idiots' that followed Apples advice and
> spent literally hundreds of hours in altivec, I'm a bit peeved at the
> whole thing. I must essentially redo _everything_. And if so, what is
I'm not replying to this on scitech because it's not
really helpful for their discussion.
what I'm wondering is: has anyone ever honestly compared
altivec with mmx/3dnow/sse*? for instance, PPC and modern x86
both have similar 128b SIMD. altivec is probably cleaner
and iirc has more visible registers. but are the differences
for instance, altivec has 32x128 and x86-64 has "only" 16x128.
but how relevant is this? studies of conventional reg-set usage
show diminishing returns after about 16 regs.
GCC now seems to have reasonably nice support for vector operations,
on top of the intrinsics, and even some auto-vectorization. any
preliminary reports of experience with gcc 4?
thanks, mark hahn.
More information about the Beowulf