[Beowulf] Article on Sanger centre
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caTue Jun 7 08:04:37 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Article on Sanger centre
- Next message: [Beowulf] Article on Sanger centre
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Slashdot is carrying an article on the infrastructure at the Sanger > Centre. http://www.primidi.com/2005/06/06.html > Goodness - still running many Alpha processors. hey! what's wrong with alphas? I was rather surprised that they've left it until now to consider replacing the alphas, though. I wouldn't have thought that blast-like stuff is all that great on alphas. perhaps they do more MD-type stuff. it's also gratifying to see a real bioinformatics site talking fairly modest numbers when it comes to sequence DB's. (so often, it seems like bioinformatics folk get carried away into extrapolating into the many-PB range...) > Might be worth reversing the car up to the loading bay the day they > are got rid of.... we have a much smaller number (around 450), and are planning to redeploy then, rather than getting rid of them. we've had them running (in 100-150p clusters) for 4+ years, and are buying >6K mostly opterons. but the alphas will be coalesced into a single cluster that will still be interesting for some codes. our es40's dissipate about 750W, and I'd say that a single modern dual-opteron (say 240W) is modestly faster in compute power. there's definitely a power savings there, but also a drastic space savings. but there are situations where power and space is relatively cheap...
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Article on Sanger centre
- Next message: [Beowulf] Article on Sanger centre
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
