[Beowulf] IB Cluster Configuration Options
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caFri Jul 29 08:08:43 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IB Cluster Configuration Options
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> As a means to reduce our cost the suggestion was raised to cascade 4 9024 > switches, or reducing the node count, Opteron clock rate, and memory. Just > wondering how severe the hop penalty might be in the case of cascading > switches? IB switch vendors claim quite low per-hop latencies. of course, the real problem is that the base of a non-fat switching tree is highly contended. (the voltaire 9024 spec says 140 ns, for instance). the question is: how much are you willing to pay for good bisection-bandwidth? personally, I cannot imagine buying IB except for extremely bandwidth-intensive apps, in which case, you probably want a non-blocking (full bisection) switching network. the 9024 doesn't seem to be offered with all 12x ports, which is kind of odd, since a classic fat tree would be most natural with 8 12x ports at the top. but a set of 5 9024-12 switches would get you a pretty well-connected set of 60 nodes. a hypercube with express links would use 8 switches and have great bandwidth and at most 3 switches on any path (I think!). maybe you should consider alternatives (Myri 10G seems extremely attractive, for instance). regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IB Cluster Configuration Options
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
