[Beowulf] Opteron memory rank limits with DDR-400
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Josip Loncaric josip at lanl.govThu Jul 28 15:39:10 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opteron memory rank limits with DDR-400
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > Quad opteron dual core 1.8Ghz It sounds like you've got 16 single-rank memory modules, 4/Opteron, so you would not see the issue I'm concerned about. Opteron memory controller apparently needs either downclocking to DDR333, or a recent Opteron revision plus an extra cycle of memory access latency, when driving 8 ranks of DDR400 memory. Downclocking is automatically enforced by some BIOSes. See the discussion at http://forums.amd.com/index.php?showtopic=49274 for more detail... There is much confusion on this topic. The most interesting comment therein is: > Of course Opterons can handle more than 4 banks, but then only at DDR333. > > Exceptional to this are the new E Revision CPUs, which are able to > handle more than 4 banks with DDR400. That is you can run DDR400 timings > with 4 dual rank modules, but it will add another cycle to the memory > access. This is referred as "Command Rate" in most bioses and could be > 1T or 2T. In the case of 4 dual rank modules, DDR400 (and an E-Rev. CPU) > it must be set at 2 T. So you get more bandwidth, but worse access > timings compared to DDR333 and 1T. Sincerely, Josip
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Opteron memory rank limits with DDR-400
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
