[Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Ben Mayer bmayer at gmail.comWed Jul 27 10:07:24 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> We are considering getting a Dual Dual-Core Opteron system vs. two Dual > Opteron systems. We like the ability to use all four cores on one model > but a lot of what we'll do is have two models running at the same time, > each using two cores. > > We are worried that running two models on one system with four cores (each > model using two cores) will not work as well as using two systems, each > with two cores/cpu's. Is this what you were refering to (Igor) when you > wrote: > Correct me if I am wrong but I am under the impression that each CPU has one memory controller, independent of the number of cores. So if you go dual core those cores are sharing a memory controller. What you have in the end if you go dual core with 2 CPUs is 4 cores with 2 memory controllers. If on the other hand you get two systems which two single core CPUs, then you will have a total of 4 cores and 4 memory controllers. So it would really depend on price of the systems and if your core needs the full memory bandwidth of a controller. -- Benjamin Mayer University of Minnesota Ph.D. Student, Computer Science HPC, Data Mining for Medical Informatics and Network Intrusion Detection
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
