[Beowulf] New HPCC results, and an MX question
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comTue Jul 19 20:53:41 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] New HPCC results, and an MX question
- Next message: [Beowulf] New HPCC results, and an MX question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 11:11:33PM -0400, Patrick Geoffray wrote: > If you randomize the machine list, then there is no difference > between the random ring latency and the average pingpong. Patrick, There likely will be a difference, because average pingpong doesn't run on all the cpus. On a 4-cpu node, that can make a big difference. To give you an example, look at the Quadrics reported numbers for random ring latency of 11.4568 usec and average ping-pong of 1.552 usec. This is on a 2-cpu node (I think). I'd bet that most of this difference has nothing to do with machine size. But I'd be happy to be proven wrong. Hopefully someone will publish a Myrinet MX-based set of HPCC results soon. (hint, hint!) > >As I said, it is in the process of being published, and I attached > >the relevant info to my posting. > > I know, tongue-in-cheek. Will you publish the raw numbers on the web > site eventually ? Yes. That's what I meant in the first place. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] New HPCC results, and an MX question
- Next message: [Beowulf] New HPCC results, and an MX question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
