[Beowulf] CCL:dual-core Opteron
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David Mathog mathog at mendel.bio.caltech.eduThu Jul 7 11:23:19 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] LCSC and SNIC Interaction: Call for Abstracts (due Aug 25, 2005)
- Next message: [Beowulf] hybrid (openmp+mpi) job submit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I am sure it is possible to find codes and test cases which will fill the > bandwidth for the memory controller. The usual suspects (Amber8, GAMESS, > BLAST, HMMer) did not. Regarding HMMer, did you try running tests where you step through a range of query sequence sizes (all vs. the same HMM database)? On the Athlon MP 2200+ machines in our cluster there was a large variation in run time resulting from complex cache interactions. This processor has a relatively small cache and is presumably much more sensitive to this than would be the Opterons. A substantial amount of reorganization of the data structures minimized this effect but at least initially going from n residues to n+1 residues in the same sequence could change the run time for the query by a factor of 3. You may be able to trigger the same effect on an Opteron by using a largish query sequence, say 4000 amino acids or so. Admittedly there are not very many proteins which are that large. Regards, David Mathog mathog at caltech.edu Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
- Previous message: [Beowulf] LCSC and SNIC Interaction: Call for Abstracts (due Aug 25, 2005)
- Next message: [Beowulf] hybrid (openmp+mpi) job submit
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
