[Beowulf] tg3 or bcm5700? Options?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
tegner at nada.kth.se tegner at nada.kth.seMon Jan 31 05:20:44 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Information Reseach Lab
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi all, We have some trouble with the parallel performance of our cluster of dual opterons MSI-9245 in IBM E325. We are using one of the internal Broadcom nics (eth0) as a "nfs-network", and the other (eth1) as a "computational network". We have tried both the tg3-driver and Broadcoms bcm5700. The tg3-driver seems to deliver good network performance over eth1 (we have used netpipe to test). The bcm5700-driver gives higher latency, but on "speedup" tests (i.e. checking the speedup of a cfd problem of fixed size on different numbers of processors) the bcm5700-driver gives significantly better results. By loading the bcm5700-driver with the options options bcm5700 adaptive_coalesce=0,0 rx_coalesce_ticks=1,1 \ rx_max_coalesce_frames=1,1 tx_coalesce_ticks=1,1 \ tx_max_coalesce_frames=1,1 the latency is improved, BUT the "speedup" performance is somewhat degraded. Question is if anyone of you have experienced these kinds of issues, and if you have suggestions on how the network performance can be "optimized" (e.g. what options to use in modprobe.conf). Thanks in advance, /jon
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Information Reseach Lab
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
