[Beowulf] Re: Cooling vs HW replacement
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bill Broadley bill at cse.ucdavis.eduThu Jan 27 14:00:49 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Cooling vs HW replacement
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Cooling vs HW replacement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 10:26:36AM -0700, Josip Loncaric wrote: > I'd just like to offer my personal guesses of what manufacturers of > commodity disk drives want to achieve: product lifespan of about 5 > years, infant mortality under 1%. I was looking at drive spec sheets and found the Maxtor Diamondmax 10 300GB drive. From the spec sheet: Start/Stop cycles (min) >50,000 Component Design Live (min) 5 years Annualized Return Rate (ARR) < 1% I don't have any personal experience with these drives, but it does look like particularly useful numbers for a spec sheet, especially when compared to MTBF. To make MTBF numbers even worse many posted numbers don't include the duty cycle. Sony bragged about higher MTBF with AIT vs DLT, only in the back of a 50 page document did they mention a 10% duty cycle vs the 100% duty cycle for the DLT numbers. -- Bill Broadley Computational Science and Engineering UC Davis
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Cooling vs HW replacement
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Cooling vs HW replacement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
