[Beowulf] Re: Cooling vs HW replacement
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David Mathog mathog at mendel.bio.caltech.eduTue Jan 18 12:41:16 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] OPTERON MPICH2
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Cooling vs HW replacement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> "Robert G. Brown" <rgb at phy.duke.edu> wrote: > > I mean, disk is SO cheap at less than $1/GB. That's certainly true for consumer grade disks. "Enterprise" or "Server" grade disks still cost a lot more than that. For instance Maxtor ultra320 drives and Seagate Cheetah drives are both about $4-5/GB. The Western Digital Raptor SATA disks are also claimed to be reliable, and are again, in the $4-5/GB range. (Ie, it isn't just SCSI that makes server disks expensive.) Sure, you can RAID the cheaper ATA/SATA disks and replace them as they fail, but if you're really working them hard, the word from the storage lists is that they will indeed fail. (Let Google be your friend.) Note that our compute nodes' disks are just Western Digital ATA drives, and we've only had one failure out of 20 in 2 years. But we don't push those drives very hard. Under normal conditions they are only used to boot the OS or occasionaly to a new load a database into memory. The disk server uses SCSI disks and is pushed much harder. Regards, David Mathog mathog at caltech.edu Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
- Previous message: [Beowulf] OPTERON MPICH2
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Cooling vs HW replacement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
