[Beowulf] RE: S2466 Wake on Lan working, anyone?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David Mathog mathog at mendel.bio.caltech.eduFri Feb 25 11:06:58 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Microsoft HPC survey spam?
- Next message: [Beowulf] motherboards for diskless nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
After messing around with this for a couple of days, with some very helpful messages from Donald Becker, I still had not managed to make WOL work on the S2466. Using pci-config it was possible to put the onboard NIC into the D3 state and to observe that the correct bit was set in the NIC when a magic packet hit it. But no matter how late into the poweroff sequence it was put into this state, once powered off (poweroff or shutdown -h), it wouldn't power back on after the magic packet arrived. I had emailed Tyan support but they never sent anything back. So today I called them, and the word came down that: (The following quotes may not be exact but are as close as I can remember.) "WOL only works on the AMD MPX boards from the S1 state". S1 state has the motherboard fully powered but the disks may be spun down. The rationale given for this appalling design decision (or more likely, cover up for the design error) was that "Most people who care about such things use a remote management card in the machine, so WOL would have been redundant". Sure, and that's why there are so many posts from people trying to make WOL work on the S2466 mobos! Well, we can all stop asking because apparently you can't get there from here. It's possible this is still a BIOS problem that they could fix but I'm leaning more towards the hypothesis that they neglected to put in the hardware support required for the NIC to actually trigger a power on event. The more I learn about Tyan the less I like them. Surely they've known all there is to know about the broken WOL for at least 3 years, yet they didn't ever post the reason for the lack of WOL function in their FAQ section for this motherboard. Could it possibly be that they didn't want to lose sales by admitting the board couldn't do WOL in a manner that was of any use to anybody? Regards, David Mathog mathog at caltech.edu Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Microsoft HPC survey spam?
- Next message: [Beowulf] motherboards for diskless nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
