[Beowulf] RAID storage: Vendor vs. parts
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Michael T. Halligan michael at halligan.orgTue Feb 22 16:24:48 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RAID storage: Vendor vs. parts
- Next message: [Beowulf] RAID storage: Vendor vs. parts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> >> I'm in the process of getting a couple 16 Bay 6.4 TB RAID units. The >> >> vendors who have given me quotes have a SATA-SCSI version for around >> >> $14,000 each. I can get a similarly equipped StorCase unit for >> around >> >> $11,000. With the StorCase I envision that I'd be more on my own if >> >> anything went wrong. However, with the cheaper price, I'd be able to >> buy >> >> a spare RAID controller to have on hand in case one of them failed >> and >> >> still save a couple grand. >> > >> let's say $300 for 300GB (sata) disks ==> $4,800 for 16 disks ... >> - pata disk is $150-$200 for 300GB disks >> >> - i'd put 2 or 3 raid controllers in it instead of 1 .. >> unless there is an absolute requirement that there is only >> 1 disk subsystem that has the capacity of 6TB on "one disk" > > That's what I'm shooting for. Anybody have good luck with volumes greater > than 2 TB with Linux? I think LSI SCSI cards are needed (?) and the 2.6 > Kernel is needed with CONFIG_LBD=y. Any hints or notes about doing this > would be greatly appreciated. Google has not been much of a friend on > this unfortunatlely. I'm guessing I'd run into NFS limits too. > > Also, am I being overly cautious about having a spare RAID controller on > hand? How frequent do RAID controllers go bad compared to disks, power > supplies and fan modules? I'd guess that it would be very infrequent. > Looking back at my own experience I think I've had to return one out of 15 > in the last eight years, and that was bad as soon as I bought it. > > If this is too off-topic let me know and I'll move it elsewhere. > > Thanks, > I've had no problems with raid voumes 4-8 terabytes in size. recently, but I use the 2.6.8 kernel and only use ICP Vortex cards, I've found the LSI cards to be sketchy at best. ------------------- BitPusher, LLC http://www.bitpusher.com/ 1.888.9PUSHER (415) 724.7998 - Mobile
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RAID storage: Vendor vs. parts
- Next message: [Beowulf] RAID storage: Vendor vs. parts
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
