[Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rossen Dimitrov rossen at VerariSoft.ComTue Feb 15 06:28:28 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > > One person alone can't do this. The best place to discuss such things is > the MPI users group meeting (EuroPVM/MPI, this year in Capri/Italy). > > Also, adding mpi.h to the standard to define an ABI is a good thing. > > Joachim > In a conversation with MPI and tool developers and I once mentioned that not defining a standard/mandatory mpi.h was probably a missed opportunity for improving interoperability of MPI. I was then told by a member of the MPI-1 Forum that this was done on purpose. This makes me think that we will not see an ABI definition for MPI any time soon. Rossen
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
