[Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Keith D. Underwood kdunder at sandia.govTue Feb 15 06:31:12 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Looking for overlaping is actually not that hard: > a) look for medium/large messages, don't waste time on small ones. I contend that this particular item is bad advice. If you send a lot of small messages, you should use MPI_Isend there as well to give the MPI implementation every opportunity to do the right thing. As we go forward, end-to-end acknowledgments are going to become a reality. The last thing you want is to spend a round-trip delay on every message you send if you send a lot of them. Yes, the implementation can copy on the sending side to allow the send to complete, but that wastes memory and time. Keith
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
