[Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comWed Feb 16 16:04:55 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 03:03:16PM -0500, Robert G. Brown wrote: > Optimizing any particular MPI (or PVM) command for either extreme is > then like robbing Peter to pay Paul, when Peter and Paul are a single > bicephalic individual that has to pay protection money to the mob for > every theft transaction (oh how I just LOVE to fold, spindle and > mutilate metaphors). Um, most MPI implementations have at least 3 algorithms, for short, long, and very long messages. So are they all breaking your rule? It's *unoptimizing* some of the cases that's at question. Most MPIs unoptimize compute/communication overlap with long messages, because it's hard work to get that right without hurting all short messages. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
