[Beowulf] Re: Re: Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies (Greg Lindahl)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Maurice Hilarius maurice at harddata.comFri Feb 11 11:15:05 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] A thread-safe PRNG for an OpenMP progra
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Lindahl wrote: >Amen. So use the MM5 t3a benchmark, maybe even SPEC HPC, the canned >benchmarks for Amber, Charmm, DL_POLY, etc. The NAS Parallel >Benchmarks are also good, they are much closer to real apps than >microbenchmarks. > >-- greg > Double Amen. ( is that a long Amen??) ;-) Now if we could only get all those benchmarks to agree with each other a bit! It's classic. Pick your arch, chipset, amount of RAM, clockspeed, NIC, switch, and so on, and you can make a selective case for almost anything.. Although on SMP the Opterons are mainly kicking butt lately due to the fact that their SMP performance is so superior.. And that brings up another can 'o worms: SMP or uni ? One can make a great performance case for either/both depending on your goals. <sigh...> With our best regards, Maurice W. Hilarius Telephone: 01-780-456-9771 Hard Data Ltd. FAX: 01-780-456-9772 11060 - 166 Avenue email:maurice at harddata.com Edmonton, AB, Canada http://www.harddata.com/ T5X 1Y3 This email, message, and content, should be considered confidential, and is the copyrighted property of Hard Data Ltd., unless stated otherwise.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] A thread-safe PRNG for an OpenMP progra
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
