[Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David Mathog mathog at mendel.bio.caltech.eduThu Dec 15 13:12:40 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > MPI detente is possible. Check out the modules package. > > http://modules.sourceforge.net/ Sort of the same problem though. lamboot (from lam-mpi) assumes that hboot is in the path. There's no time before it invokes hboot to run "modules". If there were a preceding stage in this instance just using an export statement with PATH would have done the trick. Is there some way to coerce lamboot to either: 1. set up environmental variables (preferably via a script) before running its "hboot" command. or 2. run something other than "hboot" (ie /usr/common/bin/hboot). Thanks, David Mathog mathog at caltech.edu Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
