[Beowulf] Compare and contrast MPI implementations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Chris Samuel csamuel at vpac.orgWed Dec 14 14:12:41 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Next message: [Beowulf] OT: open HPC/cluster positions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 18:00, Greg Lindahl wrote: > I see no one else wants to volunteer to answer this one... my > impression has been that the reason some folks suggest using LAM is > mainly because LAM has a better tcp driver than MPICH-1 has. On a more prosaic point different commercial applications can require different versions of MPI, leading to multiple installs of MPICH, LAM, HP-MPI, etc.. :-( Chris -- Christopher Samuel - (03)9925 4751 - VPAC Deputy Systems Manager Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing http://www.vpac.org/ Bldg 91, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Next message: [Beowulf] OT: open HPC/cluster positions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list