[Beowulf] Compare and contrast MPI implementations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David Mathog mathog at mendel.bio.caltech.eduFri Dec 9 13:16:21 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] [owner-chemistry@ccl.net: CCL: Linux Cluster Building Workshops]
- Next message: [Beowulf] Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
There are at least 4 free MPI implementations: name version MPI standard where mpich 1.2.7p1 1.2 http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/mpi/mpich/ mpich2 1.0.3 2 http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/mpi/mpich2/ lam/mpi 7.1.1 1.2,some 2 http://www.lam-mpi.org/ open-mpi 1.0 2 http://www.open-mpi.org/ What advantages and disadvantages do each of these have? I looked around for a review article or something of that sort but didn't find anything. The cluster in question has only 100baseT, so support for Myrinet and other faster interconnects doesn't matter for us. It currently has an older version of mpich 1 installed, but that sees no use since the commonly used software is all PVM. I want to run gromacs now, and they suggest using lam/mpi, but don't say *why* they suggest it. Are the MPI 2 standards fully backwards compatible with code written to the MPI 1.2 standard? Thanks, David Mathog mathog at caltech.edu Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
- Previous message: [Beowulf] [owner-chemistry@ccl.net: CCL: Linux Cluster Building Workshops]
- Next message: [Beowulf] Compare and contrast MPI implementations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
