[Beowulf] hpcc MPIRandomAccess bug
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comThu Aug 25 00:59:25 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] hpcc MPIRandomAccess bug
- Next message: [Beowulf] LSF and cpu factor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:22:17AM +0200, Joachim Worringen wrote: > But I wonder why HPCC tolerates 1% missing updates at all! What's the > justification for tolerating (exactly 1%) data loss? Because the actual problem they're solving tolerates that, and if you're solving it with a non-MPI solution, such as OpenMP or UPC, you can run a lot faster if you don't insist on an exact answer. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] hpcc MPIRandomAccess bug
- Next message: [Beowulf] LSF and cpu factor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list