[Beowulf] Parallel File system as a storage Solution
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Imran Khan Imran at workstationsuk.co.ukTue Aug 16 01:56:27 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Parallel File system as a storage Solution
- Next message: [Beowulf] how can I know that a hard disk died?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello Have you guys tried TerraGrid ? -----Original Message----- From: beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org [mailto:beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org] On Behalf Of Tim Cullen Sent: 15 August 2005 18:26 To: Mark Hahn; Robert Latham Cc: beowulf at beowulf.org Subject: Re: [Beowulf] Parallel File system as a storage Solution Don't know if this will help you or not, but as far as parameterizing Lustre goes. You can use the lfs utility to specify how a single file or all files in a given directory are laid out across your storage servers. tim --- Mark Hahn <hahn at physics.mcmaster.ca> wrote: > > I'm one of the PVFS2 developers -- just warning > you that I might be a > > bit biased :> > > I wonder if you could offer some comments on how you > see PVFS2 vs Lustre. > > > Typical /home directory usage patterns are quite > different from > > typical other file systems. Users have lots of > small files > > (.dotfiles, directories, mail (if it's in maildir > or mh format), > > source code). They run 'ls' (so end up calling > stat(2) all the time. > > yes - we actually force users to organize their > files such that > they only get a fairly small /home quota (~200MB), > but tons of > other space (/work (which is shared cross-cluster), > /scratch, > node-local /tmp, etc). it's also worth pointing out > that even the > underlying raid structure for these filesystems > should really be > different: /home has fairly small blocks, for > instance, so a big-stripe > raid5 is really a bad bet. but /scratch can be > raid0, and /work something > like raid 50... > > or that /home makes effective use of the pagecache, > and /scratch is > basically write-through. > > > I think you're on the right track here: have an > NFS-hosted /home > > directory where users can compile their > applications. have a pvfs2 > > /scratch file system where those applications can > write their IO when > > they run. > > hmm. it would be nice if FS's like Lustre and PVFS > could be parameterized to > provide adequate /home performance as well, since > it's not nearly as easy > to scale NFS. > > anyone using fscache to speed up NFS in an HPC > environment (even just > for homes)? > > thanks, mark hahn. > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or > unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Parallel File system as a storage Solution
- Next message: [Beowulf] how can I know that a hard disk died?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
