[Beowulf] 90nm opteron power usage
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Nate Faerber nfaerber at penguincomputing.comMon Aug 8 12:04:10 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 90nm opteron power usage
- Next message: [Beowulf] 90nm opteron power usage
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bill, You might want want to try CPUBurn to max out the CPUs. http://pages.sbcglobal.net/redelm/ I suggest you limit your runs to a couple of minutes at most to start. Make sure your room is adequately cooled before doing this. If you have IPMI or lm_sensors available, you might want to query the temperatures toward the end of your runs to see how hot things are getting. ./burnK7 & ./burnK7 & sleep 90s; kill %1 %2 Be careful. -nate On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 10:59 -0700, Bill Broadley wrote: > I managed to hook up my kill-a-watt to a dual opteron 2.6 GHz, 4GB pc3200, > and a 73GB scsi disk (a sun v20z). The highest power consumption I > could find was was running 1 distributed.net client per cpu. > > The results was 197-198 watts and 200-201 VA. I'm quite impressed, > our 2.2GHz version of the same box is in the 270-300 watt range. > > Has anyone found a (free/open) code that manages higher power consumption > than the distributed.net client? > > Kudos to AMD for such a big improvement, I thought it might be useful > for those planning cooling or power for any of the newer 90nm AMD chips. > > Anyone have similar numbers for a new dual nacoma/64 bit xeon? > -- Nate Faerber, Senior Engineer - Clusters Tel: 415-954-2866 Fax: 415-954-2899 Toll Free: 888-PENGUIN PENGUIN COMPUTING www.penguincomputing.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 90nm opteron power usage
- Next message: [Beowulf] 90nm opteron power usage
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
