[Beowulf] I wanna know the performance difference between Intel Nocona and AMD Opteron
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bill Broadley bill at cse.ucdavis.eduThu Apr 7 13:34:21 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] I wanna know the performance difference between Intel Nocona and AMD Opteron
- Next message: Re:[Beowulf] Compiling HPL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:12:18PM +0800, Henry_Xu at Dell.com wrote: > Hello, > > A friend of mine want to set up 32-node beowulf HPCC cluster. He has two > hardware platform to choose. One is Intel nocona , the other is AMD > Opteron. > > Can anybody send me some articles related to : > > 1. performance difference between those two platforms on 32-bit > computing; > 2. performance difference between those two platforms on 64-bit > computing; This depends on your application. Any generalization could be significantly incorrect for a given application. Buying 32 nodes based on some generalization could lead to significantly less performance per $ on your application. If your power/cooling isn't free I'd also look at power usage, I've seen power/cooling costs approach 50% of a 3 year cost to own for a $3k system. In general a dual opteron has around twice the memory bandwidth and lower power usage than the nocona. Additionally the new 90nm opterons use even less power (per MHz). -- Bill Broadley Computational Science and Engineering UC Davis
- Previous message: [Beowulf] I wanna know the performance difference between Intel Nocona and AMD Opteron
- Next message: Re:[Beowulf] Compiling HPL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
