[Beowulf] OS for 64 bit AMD
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Andrew Shewmaker agshew at gmail.comFri Apr 1 08:21:36 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] OS for 64 bit AMD
- Next message: [Beowulf] Compiling HPL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I've been running FC2 on my opteron workstation for a while
now, but I am about ready to move on to something newer.
It has been stable, but one pet peeve I have with RH's
multiarch support is that it ends up clobbering their rpm
database. It hasn't seemed to have hurt me yet, but it isn't
clean.
If you run 'rpm -Va' on an "everything" install, then it will report
that several 32-bit packages have binaries with wrong md5sums.
I find the following script more useful than a rpm verify to show
the conflicts in /usr/bin:
#!/bin/bash
for i in `ls -1 /usr/bin`; do
if [ `rpm -qf --qf "%{arch}" /usr/bin/$i` == "i386x86_64" ]; then
echo -n "/usr/bin/$i: ";
rpm -qf --qf "%{name}-%{version}.%{arch} " /usr/bin/$i;
echo;
fi
done
SuSE has a couple conflicts, but they look like oversights and
not part of their general packaging methodology. I haven't
checked any other rpm-based distro.
Andrew
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:37:24 -0500, Mike Davis <jmdavis at mail2.vcu.edu> wrote:
> What OSes are Opteron clusters out there running. Is anyone running FC2
> on opterons?
>
> I'm looking at opterons for our next cluster, but I'm not sure about
> what OS to run. Thus far we've been with RH and or RHAS. But, the next
> cluster will be big and I'm just not sure what we should run.
--
Andrew Shewmaker
- Previous message: [Beowulf] OS for 64 bit AMD
- Next message: [Beowulf] Compiling HPL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
