[Beowulf] x86-64 NUMA vs SMP kernel: appl. performance?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mikhail Kuzminsky kus at free.netMon Sep 27 09:44:23 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] socket: Address family e100 not supported by protocol
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf of bare motherboards
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In message from Reuti <reuti at staff.uni-marburg.de> (Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:43:28 +0200): >Hi, >> I have possible choice between using of SMP or NUMA-enabled x86_64 >> kernels (2.4.21 from SuSE Linux 9.0 distributive). We use 2-way >for a good NUMA support you need a 2.6.x kernel. >> Opteron-based nodes w/2 GBytes RAM per node (symmetrical DIMMs >> occupation). > >With symmetrical you mean 4 DIMMs in the machine, one for each >channel of the two CPUs? I'm too late - here in Moscow was weekend, when I received "discussion results" :-) . Yes, it means 1 512MB DIMM per each of 4 channels (2 channels for each Opteron). >Some speed tests you can find here: >http://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_content.asp?id=opteronmemory&page=1 >But I think real world tests are more interesting. Thanks, this data are very interesting also ! Yours Mikhail
- Previous message: [Beowulf] socket: Address family e100 not supported by protocol
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf of bare motherboards
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
