[Beowulf] cpu/mobo recommendations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Andrew Latham lathama at gmail.comFri Sep 24 10:11:37 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] cpu/mobo recommendations
- Next message: [Beowulf] x86-64 NUMA vs SMP kernel: appl. performance?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I belive that the Archives for this year contain tons of advice to this tune. To recap what I have read. -Mobo and chips - bleeding edge can bleed you, Heat is the issue, Quads are an option, SMP _can_ require uncommon ram setup on new boards. -Pick you case early. - few screws, good vents, tested PS -Request test units from vendors - just to see them -Talk to Manufacturers. (example Tyan guys read this list) -Diskless units have scale issues - VLAN them with bridges + multi servers read as "Do your network homework twice, once for startup and again for operation" -Don't over look buying the hardware preconfigured -Good server room means a good home - have plenty of AC and access control -Read -Be happy with what you choose. Robert will fill in any gap I left......... On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:36:57 -0500 (CDT), Bill Comisky <bcomisky at pobox.com> wrote: > > It's time to upgrade the cluster, and I'm trying to determine the > best hardware configuration for our purposes. It's been a while since I > went through this exercise and there seem to be more choices now (the last > time I added nodes, people were just starting to use AMD clusters). > > Specifically, the nodes will be diskless, and running coarsely grained > parallel problems distributed by Sun's Grid Engine. So fast ethernet > works fine for networking. Also the distributed jobs are Fortran77/90 and > C codes, which I can recompile for 64bit processors if need be. My main > criteria are: > > - best price/performance ratio: our simulations are essentially > independent, so overall runtime for a set of jobs will scale almost > linearly with number of processors. So the best solution is likely not > the cutting edge fastest, but a step back from the fastest where we can > buy more nodes for the same $$. > > - hardware reliability > > - rack form factor > > I'm assuming 2 way SMP motherboards are still the way to go. If anyone > has gone through the same process recently, I'd appreciate any > recommendations or pointers to good info. > > thanks, > bill > > -- > Bill Comisky > bcomisky at pobox.com > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > -- Andrew Latham http://www.lathama.com lathama at gmail.com lathama at yahoo.com lathama at lathama.com If any of the above are not working we have bigger problems than my email.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] cpu/mobo recommendations
- Next message: [Beowulf] x86-64 NUMA vs SMP kernel: appl. performance?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
