[Beowulf] A Good Linux Distribution to Start with?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tim Mattox tmattox at gmail.comWed Sep 8 18:43:40 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] A Good Linux Distribution to Start with?
- Next message: [Beowulf] A Good Linux Distribution to Start with?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello Jeff, What processors/hardware is in your nodes? Are they AMD64? Do you have SATA drives? A primary consideration is which distribution supports all your hardware. SATA support is still tough to come by. Also full AMD64 support is more wide spread now, but you still need to check first if a distribution will do 64-bit mode "right out of the box" as well as have both 32-bit and 64-bit dynamic libraries. I would recommend a Linux distribution that is supported by the cluster management tool(s) that you select. Some of these tools will even supply the distribution for you. The days of installing a full non-cluster linux distribution on all your nodes are gone, or at least numbered... Take a look at any of these tools (in alphabetical order): Clustermatic http://www.clustermatic.org/ Oscar http://oscar.openclustergroup.org/ Rocks http://www.rocksclusters.org/ Warewulf http://warewulf-cluster.org/ There are several commercial cluster distributions worth considering as well. I personally use Warewulf, and liked it so much I became one of its developers. Warewulf is a bit different in that it builds on top of "most" RPM based distributions. As one of its developers, I can even foresee it eventually working with Debian and/or Gentoo. But currently it requires RPM and yum to do it's work. As for which distribution to use with it, I'm anxiously awaiting the cAos-2 distribution to be ready from http://caosity.org/ cAos-2 is built around the 2.6 kernel with gcc 3.4.x, and will have full AMD64 support. It has other good features, but those are the ones I care about. In the meantime, I use cAos-1 with it's optional gcc3 package and a 2.4.27 kernel. The reasons why I use cAos-1 & 2 is that they are easily set up in very minimal installs, yet are very easily added to if I need additional packages. The reason I use Warewulf is it's cluster management philosophy is very flexible yet simple. All nodes in the cluster boot from a ramdisk image that is built on the master (or head) node. That ramdisk image is easily customized, and updates to the nodes are just a reboot or rsync away. This is drifting off topic, so I'll leave with this thought: Rather than asking what distribution to use for your Beowulf, you may want to ask what Beowulf toolset should you use... -- Tim Mattox - tmattox at gmail.com - http://homepage.mac.com/tmattox/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] A Good Linux Distribution to Start with?
- Next message: [Beowulf] A Good Linux Distribution to Start with?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
