[Beowulf] Re: building a new cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joachim Worringen joachim at ccrl-nece.deThu Sep 2 01:24:37 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: building a new cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: building a new cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
SC Huang wrote: > 5. I only have wall-clocking timing of my code on various platforms. I > don't know how sensitive it is to cache size. I guess the bigger cache, > the better, because the code is operating large arrays all the time. If your arrays are really large, than it's the memory bandwidth that counts, not the cache size. Or your ability to implement cache-friendly (blocked) versions of your code (probably with the assistance of libraries like ATLAS). Just a side note on this: we have a 32-node dual-Athlon cluster with Myrinet in the lab as well as an SX-6i (single processor SX-6). We've seen our financial modelling codes run faster on the SX-6i than on the cluster (with a non-trivially parallized version). And in contrast to the cluster, the SX-6i is running non-stop for months (as long as we have it here). It's much smaller and more energy-efficient, too - but it's not cheaper. Joachim -- Joachim Worringen - NEC C&C research lab St.Augustin fon +49-2241-9252.20 - fax .99 - http://www.ccrl-nece.de
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: building a new cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: building a new cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
