[Beowulf] bandwidth: who needs it?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caSat Oct 16 14:36:01 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: s_update() missing from AFAPI ?
- Next message: [Beowulf] bandwidth: who needs it?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
do you have applications that are pushing the limits of MPI bandwidth? for instance, code that actually comes close to using the 8-900 MB/s that current high-end interconnect provides? we have a fairly wide variety of codes inside SHARCnet, but I haven't found anyone who is even complaining about our last-generation fabric (quadrics elan3, around 250 MB/s). is it just that we don't have the right researchers? I've heard people mutter about earthquake researchers being able to pin a 800 MB/s network, and claims that big FFT folk can do so as well. by contrast, many people claim to notice improvements in latency from old/mundane (6-7 us) to new/good (<2 us). I'd be interested in hearing about applications you know of which are very sensitive to having large bandwidth (say, .8 GB/s today). thanks, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: s_update() missing from AFAPI ?
- Next message: [Beowulf] bandwidth: who needs it?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
