[Beowulf] 64bit comparisons
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Hujsak, Jonathan T (US SSA) jonathan.hujsak at baesystems.comFri Oct 8 13:15:26 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] NPC2004: Call For Participation
- Next message: [Beowulf] 64bit comparisons
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi! We're looking at implementing a large G5 cluster here at BAE Systems. Have you gained any new 'lessons learned' since the communication below? Can you recommend a good version of MPI to use for these? We've been looking at MPICH, MPIPro and also the Apple xgrid... Thanks! Jonathan Hujsak BAE Systems San Diego Bill Broadley bill at cse.ucdavis.edu <mailto:beowulf%40beowulf.org?Subject=%5BBeowulf%5D%2064bit%20comparison s&In-Reply-To=200405141644.i4EGi1Aq023213%40marvin.ibest.uidaho.edu> Fri May 14 11:48:21 PDT 2004 * Previous message: [Beowulf] 64bit comparisons <http://www.beowulf.org/pipermail/beowulf/2004-May/016707.html> * Next message: [Beowulf] 64bit comparisons <http://www.beowulf.org/pipermail/beowulf/2004-May/016724.html> * Messages sorted by: [ date ] <http://www.beowulf.org/pipermail/beowulf/2004-May/date.html#16711> [ thread ] <http://www.beowulf.org/pipermail/beowulf/2004-May/thread.html#16711> [ subject ] <http://www.beowulf.org/pipermail/beowulf/2004-May/subject.html#16711> [ author ] <http://www.beowulf.org/pipermail/beowulf/2004-May/author.html#16711> _____ On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 09:44:01AM -0700, Robert B Heckendorn wrote: > One of the options we are strongly considering for our next cluster is > going with Apple X-servers. There performance is purported to be good Careful to benchmark both processors at the same time if that is your intended usage pattern. Are the dual-g5's shipping yet? Last I heard yield problems were resulting in only uniprocessor shipments. My main concern that despite the marketing blurb of 2 10GB/sec CPU interfaces or similar that there is a shared 6.4 GB/sec memory bus. > and their power consumption is small. Has anyone measured a dual g5 xserv with a kill-a-watt or similar? > Can people comment on any comparisons betwee Apple and (Athlon64 > or Opteron)? Personally I've had problems, I need to spend more time resolving them, things like: * Need to tweak /etc/rc to allow Mpich to use shared memory * Latency between two mpich processes on the same node is 10-20 times the linux latency. I've yet to try LAM. * Differences in semaphores requires a rewrite for some linux code I had * Difference in the IBM fortran compiler required a rewrite compared to code that ran on Intel's, portland group's, and GNU's fortran compiler. Given all that I'm still interested to see what the G5 is good at and under what workloads the G5 wins perf/price or perf/watt. -- Bill Broadley Computational Science and Engineering UC Davis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20041008/19c8e119/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] NPC2004: Call For Participation
- Next message: [Beowulf] 64bit comparisons
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
