[Beowulf] Oldest functioning clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Roger L. Smith roger at ERC.MsState.EduMon Nov 22 18:50:45 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Oldest functioning clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] Good upgrade intervals (Was: Oldest functioning clusters)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Robert G. Brown wrote: > You need a few more rules. Do we count a cluster as being in continuous > service even if its hardware has rolled over several times in its > existence? Ok, fair enough, but I don't really want to be too pedantic about it. Let's say that it has to be substantially original. The vast majority of the nodes must be substantially original. > If yes, brahma has been running continuously since the fall of '96, > although the last of its original systems (200 MHz PPros) have been dead > for a year or three now. I don't think that this would meet the definition. _\|/_\|/_\|/_\|/_\|/_\|/_\|/_\|/_\|/_\|/_\|/_\|/_\|/_\|/_\|/_\|/_\|/_\|/_ | Roger L. Smith Phone: 662-325-3625 | | Sr. Systems Administrator FAX: 662-325-7692 | | roger at ERC.MsState.Edu http://WWW.ERC.MsState.Edu/~roger | | Mississippi State University | |____________________________________ERC__________________________________|
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Oldest functioning clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] Good upgrade intervals (Was: Oldest functioning clusters)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
