[Beowulf] Gigabit Eithernet Ring
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comMon Nov 22 17:38:41 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Gigabit Eithernet Ring
- Next message: [Beowulf] Gigabit Eithernet Ring
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 10:59:11AM +1100, steve_heaton at ozemail.com.au wrote: > Question: Given that the MPI is performed using a ring would there be any advantage in using a "ring" (switchless) network topology over gigabit Ethernet? Not really. Small gigE switches are so good and so cheap that getting rid of one isn't worth much hassle. > I understand that Linux would then be responsible for the routing > (as opposed to the dedicated hardware in the switch). But in return, I > should get deterministic performance as opposed to probabilistic Running with a gigE switch shouldn't cause too much non-deterministic performance. If you are actually seeing some non-deterministic performance, you might want to look into what's actually causing it. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Gigabit Eithernet Ring
- Next message: [Beowulf] Gigabit Eithernet Ring
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
