Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] Gigabit Eithernet Ring

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

steve_heaton at ozemail.com.au steve_heaton at ozemail.com.au
Mon Nov 22 15:59:11 PST 2004


G'day all

I humbly kneel before the great collective and seek their tolerance of someone new to the Dark Art of Beowulf clustering ;)

Despite having spent 14 years in a past life working on "commercial" IT&T, I have now found the true use of such power is in the support of science. I'm slogging towards my Masters in Astronomy and Large Scale Structure dynamics is a passion. To this end I've built a small cluster to do some Nbody sims (and learn a bit about Beowulf clustering).

The short description is 4x dual P3's with gigabit Ethernet to an unmanaged switch (anyone with more than 4 nodes is just showing off ;)

The Nbody code uses MPI with a "pipe" (ring) IPC structure.
http://carol.wins.uva.nl/~spz/act/modesta/Software/src/nbody_sh1p.html

Question: Given that the MPI is performed using a ring
 would there be any advantage in using a "ring" (switchless) network topology over gigabit Ethernet?

I understand that Linux would then be responsible for the routing (as opposed to the dedicated hardware in the switch). But in return, I should get deterministic performance as opposed to probabilistic. Obviously the performance bottom line is what counts regardless!

Thoughts, comments, criticisms gratefully accepted. If the idea of a ring is a dud I can save myself the bucks! :)


Cheers
Steve

This message was sent through MyMail http://www.mymail.com.au





More information about the Beowulf mailing list