[Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Ashley Pittman ashley at quadrics.comTue Nov 16 10:09:17 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Next message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 17:51 -0500, Patrick Geoffray wrote: > > Going trough a crossbar cost about 100-150ns these days. This isn't necessarily true, we reckon about 25ns on elan4. This doesn't give you perfect latency scaling across very large networks but it's very close. Ashley,
- Previous message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Next message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list