[Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 9, Issue 12
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.comFri Nov 12 15:33:22 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 9, Issue 12
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 9, Issue 12
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Håkon Bugge wrote: > I know of systems on previous lists which are listed as Myrinet systems, > but are actually only running Gbe. This might stem from the fact that > some vendors would like to get as many system listed as possible. When > they have benchmarked and submitted an N-node cluster with Myrinet, it > is very tempting to submit another N-node cluster using the same node > hardware;-). Can you see such systems on the last list ? The Top500 team asked us before the official release to check the Myrinet entries and we can confirm that we shipped hardware for all of them. We have found a few mistakes in the past (Ethernet cluster with the same Rmax than similar Myrinet cluster for example). Sometimes, results are abnormal (Myrinet clusters benchmarked with Ethernet or very bad efficiency because of bad HPL parameters), sometimes people are too busy to even run Linpack and their machines are not on the list, but vendors tricks are usually easy to spot. Patrick -- Patrick Geoffray Myricom, Inc. http://www.myri.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 9, Issue 12
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 9, Issue 12
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
