[Beowulf] AMD’s Direct Connect Architecture
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Keith D. Underwood kdunder at sandia.govWed Jun 30 15:23:50 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] AMD’s Direct Connect Architecture
- Next message: [Beowulf] AMD’s Direct Connect Architecture
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 14:52, rbw at ahpcrc.org wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:52:34 -0700, Greg Lindahl wrote: > > >Red Storm is 1-way nodes. > > Right, but there is room for confusion here because the > node boards include 4 Opteron processors ... yes, each > with their own directly controlled memory ... but intra- > board accesses will be on a short hyper transport path > through the local router. On Red Storm (as it is being delivered to Sandia), there is no practical difference between communications on a board and communications off of a board. Both go through the NIC/router. Ok, so going off board could cost you a few extra nanoseconds of wire delay, but.... Keith -- Keith D. Underwood <kdunder at sandia.gov>
- Previous message: [Beowulf] AMD’s Direct Connect Architecture
- Next message: [Beowulf] AMD’s Direct Connect Architecture
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
