[Beowulf] Didn't we see this before?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Lux James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.govThu Jun 24 11:33:39 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Didn't we see this before?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Distribution / Kernel Memory (STREAM) performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 09:20 AM 6/24/2004 -0500, you wrote: >Do we have any particular reason to think this foray will produce a >Windows implementation that will offer significant benefit to the science >and engineering developers over what we're doing? > >At the risk of being accused of taking things out of context, I >particularly liked this quote: > >"Parallel-computing clusters are increasingly being seen in the >enterprise," Microsoft product manager Dennis Oldroyd says. "It's been the >domain of academia and research. Now, with low-cost standardized hardware, >it's becoming less of a niche play." > >So: have we been relegated to niche status? Somehow I thought what I'd >done with geodestic processing codes in the past was closer to >leading-edge than niche, but I guess, since I wasn't using Windows, I was >deluded. > ><http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=22101604> > >- A niche to Microsoft is a huge gaping hole to the rest of the world. I like the statement about growing popularity of Linux on high performance clusters (hmmm. what's Linux replacing?) It will all come down to support and integration... Will MS support the hardware interconnects (or, will the hardware vendors want to write MS drivers for their hardware)? Will MS provide decent hooks into their development environment (.NET, Visual Studio)? How much of an ordeal will it be to take a useful code running on a Linux cluster and port it over to your shiny new Windows Server2003/HPC edition cluster? Is it just configure/make? What will the licensing work like? If we change the hardware configuration, will WS2003/HPC need to "phone Redmond" to authorize? Does WS2003 support NFS mount points? (Win2000 doesn't) For "from scratch" development, it's probably not a real big deal which environment you develop for (assuming that they both "work"), and presumably, the OS isn't consuming the majority of the CPU cycles in either case. James Lux, P.E. Spacecraft Telecommunications Section Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Stop 161-213 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena CA 91109 tel: (818)354-2075 fax: (818)393-6875
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Didn't we see this before?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Distribution / Kernel Memory (STREAM) performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
