Fedora cluster project? (was Re: [Beowulf] Opteron/AthlonClustering)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Lombard, David N david.n.lombard at intel.comThu Jun 10 12:42:47 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Redmond is at it, again
- Next message: [Beowulf] ATOLL at ISC 2004
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From: Jeffrey B. Layton; Wednesday, June 09, 2004 6:15 PM
[wholesale deletia]
>... As I've said before, I'd like to see commercial
>app providers to support something like a kernel/glibc combo
>independent of the distro (as Greg as pointed out, Pathscale has
>already gone this route). I'm encouraging all of our commercial
>app companies to do this. We'll see if this has any affect or not.
I did exactly that when MSC.Nastran was first released for Linux ('98?).
It works quite well for batch-oriented applications and for ISVs that
use the environment properly.
It starts breaking down with C++-based GUI apps and/or as the number of
third-party components increases.
--
David N. Lombard
My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Redmond is at it, again
- Next message: [Beowulf] ATOLL at ISC 2004
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
