[Beowulf] Re: Redmond is at it, again
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Suvendra Nath Dutta sdutta at cfa.harvard.eduThu Jun 10 08:18:59 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Redmond is at it, again
- Next message: [Beowulf] Correct Units for quoting Interconnect Bandwidth ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jun 9, 2004, at 11:11 PM, Robert G. Brown wrote: > Scripting languages aren't toys, but neither are they ideal high > performance computing vehicles, for the most part. > I know you say for the most part, but I think this is a perception that we should really look at. Prof. Edelman was really able to challenge this perception with his MATLAB*P. The notion is that MATLAB's implementation of LAPack is really excellent. So if used judiciously (especially as a set of mathematical libraries rather than a scripting engine) it can be faster than most direct implementation of code written in C/C++. Of course MATLAB's prohibitive licensing policy essentially chokes off any such effort. Suvendra
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Redmond is at it, again
- Next message: [Beowulf] Correct Units for quoting Interconnect Bandwidth ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
