[Beowulf] Re: Redmond is at it, again
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Leif Nixon nixon at nsc.liu.seMon Jun 7 04:28:47 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Redmond is at it, again
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Redmond is at it, again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Douglas O'Flaherty" <douglas at shore.net> writes: > When Cornell deployed the Windows clusters back a few years, the > typical cluster developer grumbled some. The surprise was how many new > users asked to be on the Windows clusters. Many were not from the hard > sciences, but from economics and other departments who needed to do > numerical analysis. We've seen a similar phenomenon in moving from UNICOS to Linux clusters; users appreciate being able to run the same code on both their laptop and on our big machines. (Yeah, yeah, this isn't always possible in general - your code might need a high performance cluster to run in any worthwhile manner - but when it *is* possible, it is nice.) I'll have to admit, grudgingly, that this may be applicable in the Windows user/Windows cluster case as well. -- Leif Nixon Systems expert ------------------------------------------------------------ National Supercomputer Centre Linkoping University ------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Redmond is at it, again
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Redmond is at it, again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
