[Beowulf] Redmond is at it, again
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
unix_no_win unix_no_win at yahoo.comWed Jun 2 10:21:15 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Redmond is at it, again
- Next message: [Beowulf] Redmond is at it, again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
<<------snip snip ---------------->> > I recently talked to RedHat about purchasing RHEL > for my systems. Based > on my needs for two large clusters and a smattering > of desktops, they were > asking nearly $10,000 PER YEAR for it, and that was > educational pricing! This would be for how many computers?? $10,000 per year is not bad if your talking over 500 computers. > But when we started trying to decide how up upgrade > our RedHat 7.3 > installations, we were stymied. We couldn't justify > the costs of the > commercial distros, I need something a little more > stable than Fedora, and > I'm just a bit uneasy about converting these large > production clusters to > any of the other distros. It comes down to support and where to point a finger at. If you feel comfortable taking that risk in exposure if you have problems, then load Debian or Gentoo, etc. > > Part of this reluctance is because I'm sure if I > have problems with my > commercial compilers or other commercial software > that I run, they're not > going to want to give me support if I'm running some > distro that they've > never heard of. I would venture to guess that if you are paying full price for support on compilers etc, you will have better luck getting support than if your not. Once again if you do have problems where does the finger end up pointing? > I'm willing to spend a little money to get the > software, but not the rates > that they're demanding. Seems to me that ~$20 per node is not an exorbitant amount to keep that finger from ending up pointing at me if there are problems. Like it or not the cow has figured out that the milk should no longer be "free" (And there are arguments that it was never "free" in the first place) If you wish to use commercial software or brand-name hardware the vendors have to draw the line somewhere to keep their costs in line. That is business reality. I am no fan of M$ but don't be suprised to see their market share grow in this segment, especially when attitudes of "I want everything for free!" are prevalent. While fine for small clusters with limited accountability larger clusters that provide more services to more folks have to have data center best practices applied to them, especially when you look at the significant investment involved in putting together and running a cluster. Just my $0.02 James __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Redmond is at it, again
- Next message: [Beowulf] Redmond is at it, again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
