[Beowulf] Network benchmark - MPI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduFri Jul 2 03:33:37 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Network benchmark - MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Network benchmark - MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Jonathan Michael Nowacki wrote: > Just wondering, if their is a benchmark or program that I can use to test > the maximum bandwidth of a cluster from node to node, or all nodes > communicating to the master node. I'm thinking any kind of bandwidth test > will do, but the purpose is to see how much traffic a 40 node cluster can > take when running MrBayes (a MPI program). Wow, a tough one. There are several ways of doing it, but most of them would take a fair bit of work on your part. The final answer would also depend >>strongly<< on the organization of MrBayes itself, so the standard answer is to use MrBayes to do the benchmark. You >>might<< be successful in making lots of bisection bandwidth measurements according to some communications pattern(s) through your switch and with your nodes and be able to predict MrBayes' performance, if you are really good and work very hard. However, it is pretty easy to measure MrBayes' performance -- date;/usr/bin/time MrBayes [testproblem args];date will give you a decent system time/wall clock time measure. To get basic microscopic rates, look for netpipe. Here is a paper on its design: http://www.scl.ameslab.gov/netpipe/paper/full.html and here is the main project page: http://www.scl.ameslab.gov/Projects/NetPIPE/ netpipe is probably the "best" extant network performance microbenchmark, although there are useful components in lmbench as well, and there is an older benchmark called netperf that was very good in its day until it was abandoned, unloved, on the side of the open source road. Netpipe has the advantage of being directly integrated with MPI and PVM and giving transparent and direct tests of a variety of native drivers so you can test e.g. myrinet or infiniband "directly" and not just in a communications library context. And of course you can directly test TCP. So if you want to go the microscopic route (which is kind of fun, so why not?) get netpipe and measure your point-to-point bandwidth and latency under a variety of conditions. This still won't give you a really accurate idea of either master/slave performance or fully distributed node-to-node performance, because that depends VERY strongly on program organization and synchronization, but it does give you the basic building blocks in terms of which to understand it. HTH, rgb > > thanks in advance, > Jon > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > -- Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/ Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305 Durham, N.C. 27708-0305 Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb at phy.duke.edu
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Network benchmark - MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Network benchmark - MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
